Journal of Mathematical Problems, Equations and Statistics
  • Printed Journal
  • Refereed Journal
  • Peer Reviewed Journal

P-ISSN: 2709-9393, E-ISSN: 2709-9407

2024, Vol. 5, Issue 1, Part B


Comparison of numerical accuracy of bisection, false position, newton-Raphson’s and secant methods


Author(s): Lavkush Pandey and Veena Singh

Abstract: Comparison of numerical accuracy of bisection method, method of false position, Newton-Raphson method and secant method have been made by calculating the fourth roots of numbers 1 to 30 using computer programs developed in C++ programming language. Average percentage error of Bisection method, method of false position, Newton-Raphson method and secant method have been found to be 0.,000003048055, 0.000027500512, 0.000006303776 and 0.000005833857 respectively. These errors indicate that the secant method is better than Bisection method, Newton-Raphson’s method and the method of false position. This is analogous to the theoretical interpretation of these methods.

Pages: 134-136 | Views: 165 | Downloads: 150

Download Full Article: Click Here

Journal of Mathematical Problems, Equations and Statistics
How to cite this article:
Lavkush Pandey and Veena Singh. Comparison of numerical accuracy of bisection, false position, newton-Raphson’s and secant methods. Journal of Mathematical Problems, Equations and Statistics. 2024; 5(1): 134-136.
Journal of Mathematical Problems, Equations and Statistics
Call for book chapter